Acer Aspire X5900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X5900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FIH57
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100120
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 14 '18 at 07:38
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 128
54% 89 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 206
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 331.65
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 1.62
3% 3.79 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 3.61
4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 229 217 232 228 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 250
Write 241
Mixed 230
SusWrite 218
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 36
114% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 164
129% 177 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 134%
WD WD20NPVX-00EA4T0 2TB
803GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 79 82 80 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47% Average
Read 82.5
Write 79
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 81
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 60%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 26.5
38% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 48%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 19.6
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 19.5
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X5900 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X5900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback