Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Notebook P65_67HSHP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_67HSHP
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170223
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '18 at 05:19
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 220 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 599 61% 492 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 67A1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.76% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 125 Parallax 7.34 6% 46.4 fps	MRender 9.95 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 14.5 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 444 236 151 151 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 436 Write 420 Mixed 372 SusWrite 259 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 35.5 128% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 306 223% 286 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 9GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 493 Write 439 Mixed 384 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 54.6 187% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 341 259% 349 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 228GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 94 94 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 89.8 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 94.1 54% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 2x16GB 927 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 24.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 25.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	191x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	171x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	40x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
Blue SATA M.2 250GBWD $89Bench 81%, 7,519 samples	8x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	28x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	8x
CM4X8GF2400C16S4 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 789 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 152% - Outstanding

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16