MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 692
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 45.8
32% 49 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 50.4
39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 498 471 454 282 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,887
Write 1,033
Mixed 698
SusWrite 431
223% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 51.8
202% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 460
398% 610 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 194%
Great: 283%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
20GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 82 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 88
Write 85.8
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 81
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
558GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 91 91 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 74
Write 71.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 88.3
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 70%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
61GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 64.7
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 107 126 113 122 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 87
Write 42.3
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 119
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 28GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 46.8
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 22.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback