Lenovo 3093RD7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 3093RD7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3093RD7
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 06:40
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 620
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 98.4
49% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.51 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 91 100 99 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 87
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 97.5
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 0443 RMT3010EF48E7W1333 3GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback