MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 04:38
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 125
60% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 261
31% 238 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1074 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 86.3
51% 70.5 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 79.7
55% 65.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 271 118 103 88 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 482
Write 434
Mixed 388
SusWrite 176
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 46
154% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 255
193% 258 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 134%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
275GB free
Firmware: 0001YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 97 99 94 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 71.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 95.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 90
Write 92.7
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 78.9
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
132GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 30.3
Mixed 19
SusWrite 29.3
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback