Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 13:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 94.8
49% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 180
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 9.25
6% 8.78 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 10
Parallax 2.47
7% 6.93 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 8.77
Splatting 10.1
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 81 77 78 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 126
Write 99.2
Mixed 110
SusWrite 76.3
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 24.8
97% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 98.1
78% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL8-2GBRM Kingston 9905402-174.A00G OCZ3F1600LV2G Kingston 9905584-015.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback