Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 84.9
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 91.2
49% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 184
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.37
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.1
7% 9.58 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 12.2
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 835 MHz, MLim: 980 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 1.22
3% 3.22 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 67 72 75 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 143
Write 108
Mixed 108
SusWrite 73.6
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 25.9
106% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 83.1
70% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL8-2GBRM Kingston 9905402-174.A00G OCZ3F1600LV2G Kingston 9905584-015.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback