TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Punch GDT-705-1032

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPunch GDT-705-1032  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 15:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 789
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 94.7%
 Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.5
86% 105 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 96
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 83.9%
 Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 268 45 10 44 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 487
Write 385
Mixed 341
SusWrite 88.4
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 14
112% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.7
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
13% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 59.2%
 Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 195 193 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 151
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 194
113% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 859B CT8G4DFD824A.M16FB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 80.8%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback