MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2PC
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '18 at 22:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 165
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 440
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
MSI(1462 1106) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8831
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 32
20% 28 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 23.6
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 293 320 312 304 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 412
Write 240
Mixed 256
SusWrite 302
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 25.3
107% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 233
194% 282 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G1600L2S Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback