HP ZBook 15 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2253
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 19:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 159
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 397
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2253) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 5.75
3% 4.65 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 6.91
4% 5.35 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 3%
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
HP(103C 2253) 2GB
CLim: 666 MHz, MLim: 752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 5.59
4% 5.15 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 6.07
Splatting 5.61
5% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 301 324 280 298 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47% Average
Read 312
Write 293
Mixed 211
SusWrite 300
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 12.1
46% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 13.3
20% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 47%
Great: 105%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 116 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 93.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 116
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G2 Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback