Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 285
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 938
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 62.4
47% 61.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 51
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 327 253 143 226 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 333
Mixed 188
SusWrite 238
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 44.6
164% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 282
228% 322 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
64GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 336 330 326 326 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,019
Mixed 494
SusWrite 384
174% 786 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 52.1
205% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 754
618% 884 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 178%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 137 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 120
Mixed 69
SusWrite 138
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
133GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 93 92 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 70.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 92.1
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
260GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 77.5
Write 80.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 79.7
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
821GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 203 203 203 201 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 160
Mixed 29
SusWrite 200
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 2.1
386% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Kingston DT R400 32GB
4GB free, PID 1687, Kingston DT R400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 25 24 25 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 23.5
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 26.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 29.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback