ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Vostro 5470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

System	Dell Vostro 5470 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0K0PF0
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140505
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '14 at 14:39
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393 39,249 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 78.1 2-Core 143 51% 110 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 220 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0616) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3960 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 6 4% 4.76 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.12 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 19520084 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13606456393738 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 7 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 44 103082098720 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 103082098720 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19520084 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19520084 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19520084 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 151 (EA) Unknown 0 0 209 (F1) Unknown 0 0 209 (F2) Unknown 0 0 80	84.8% Excellent	Read 497 Write 326 Mixed 382 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 99.9 4K Mixed 16.7 118% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 81.3 108% 193 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 85%
Kingspec KSM-mSATA.7H-064MJ 64GB 5GB free Firmware: SVN474 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 347 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 95 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 524288 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 179 179 33030588 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Vostro 5470 Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 5470

CPU
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	116x
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	68x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	63x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	246x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x

RAM
SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG 1x8GBSmartBench 28%, 3,351 samples	82x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 2,672 samples	45x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback