Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '18 at 00:45
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 467
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
XFX(1682 3130) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 21.6
20% 23.7 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 26.3
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 388 277 162 137 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 454
Mixed 357
SusWrite 243
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 40.4
133% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
23GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 67 65 67 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 108
Write 80.7
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 65.1
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 70 66 67 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 99.3
Write 83.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 66.9
99% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 42%
WD 07TEVT External 750GB
408GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 35 35 35 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 33.9
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 16%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 69 67 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 90.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 68.1
102% 77 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
263% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB
154GB free, PID 0741
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 52.7
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 54.9
67% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback