Asrock X79 Extreme11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160815
Uptime16.9 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 19:57
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 99
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 685
62% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 65 102 112 71 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 237
Write 127
Mixed 150
SusWrite 95.1
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 21.9
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 147
106% 142 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 83%
WD WD9001BKHG-02D22 900GB
676GB free
Firmware: SR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 100
Write 18.4
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 14.3
27% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 32
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback