HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	7.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111102
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 16:10
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 113 52% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 376 37% 301 Pts	64-Core 681 42% 681 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 228GB free Firmware: 18.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 302 (03) Spinup time 144 143 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1345 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 3 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29225 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 78 300 (BC) Unknown 100 97 29 (BE) vendor-specific 69 32 3208912371743 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 72 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1304 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 199 27 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 22 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 30	52.5% Above average	Read 104 Write 79.5 Mixed 21.8 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.37 88% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA3 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 226GB free Firmware: ABB0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 125 Write 130 Mixed 115 93% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.18 72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 119%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1C03 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 40.2 Write 39 Mixed 28.5 27% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 35%
HGST HDN 728080ALE604 8TB 4.5TB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.48% Terrible	Read 28.2 Write 23.8 Mixed 24.7 32% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.04 4% 0.05 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 58GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 16.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	68x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16