PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 40.2 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '19 at 01:15 |
Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Zotac(19DA 3260) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$79
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0410D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 237 239 228 241 241 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 149 150 141 111 142 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
|||
WD WD30EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 85 87 82 82 83 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 145 141 142 141 MB/s
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 91 88 86 88 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |