Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 10:39
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 115 57% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 228 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 68.6 Parallax 84 54% 73.1 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 57.6 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5767886 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -49821620628604 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5230 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3467 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 23 85 51545178135 (C2) HDA temperature 23 85 51545178135 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5767886 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5767886 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5767886 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 81 81 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14307 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11837 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11837 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17501	47.2% Average	Read 265 Write 175 Mixed 202 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 12.9 83% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 13.1 18% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 439GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 171 1958 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2432 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1718 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1224 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3092 (C2) HDA temperature 119 99 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.8% Very good	Read 130 Write 141 Mixed 140 104% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.29 113% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 109%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 225GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 216 176 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9728 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 13904 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8823 (BE) vendor-specific 74 30 26 (C2) HDA temperature 124 80 26 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.3% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 61.8 Mixed 61.8 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.44 109% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P45T-ES3G Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P45T-ES3G

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 97%, 11,302 samples	1x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16