Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V4.1
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150305
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 20:17
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	61%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 95.5 47% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 254 26% 209 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 6555) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8831 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 32.2 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 34.4 26% 36 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 36.6 27% 32 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB 3,551 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7849 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 888 (B1) Unknown 91 91 174 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 38 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32647094720	81.7% Excellent	Read 505 Write 400 Mixed 409 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 21.6 101% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 18.3 51% 109 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 112%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 683GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 171 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8994 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1117 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 91811 (C2) HDA temperature 123 95 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	72.7% Very good	Read 126 Write 127 Mixed 119 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.26 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB GKH800SO51208-1600 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V4.1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V4.1

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	5x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	3x

SSD
SSD Plus 480GBSanDisk $40Bench 53%, 16,752 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBGKH800SO51208-1600Bench 54%, 664 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16