Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 102
44% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 161
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37% Below average
Lighting 43.6
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 65.7
36% 53.5 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 41.5
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 480GB 480GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 77 83 181 264 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 332
Write 88.1
Mixed 162
SusWrite 153
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 21.8
82% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 133
91% 117 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 101%
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 94 94 102 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 90.9
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 96.5
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 133%
JMicron 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 117 132 129 144 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69% Good
Read 164
Write 175
Mixed 107
SusWrite 134
194% 145 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.3
233% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 95%
JMicron Generic 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 117 132 128 145 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 212
Write 176
Mixed 131
SusWrite 134
213% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.9
310% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/2GX KHX1866C9D3/2GX Corsair CML8GX3M2A1866C9 Corsair CML8GX3M2A1866C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback