Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 101
44% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 96.7
14% 99.6 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 66.1
40% 57.2 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 51.6
45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 134 114 125 91 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 351
Write 206
Mixed 238
SusWrite 119
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 39.5
139% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 205
159% 218 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/2GX KHX1866C9D3/2GX Corsair CML8GX3M2A1866C9 Corsair CML8GX3M2A1866C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.8% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback