Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 85.9 39% 62.1 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 345 35% 285 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 60GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.64 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 382 Write 52.2 Mixed 153 42% 196 MB/s	4K Read 8.48 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 7.38 28% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 18.4 30% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 96%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2TB free Firmware: 6.64 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 153 Write 102 Mixed 125 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.16 48% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18x2GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 18 of 18 slots used 36GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.3% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon L55201stBench 57%, 246 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples	1x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	1x
Bliksem 256GBBench 64%, 39 samples	1x
KXG50ZNV256G TOS 256GBNvmeBench 145%, 335 samples	1x

Value: 122% - Outstanding

Total price: $166

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16