Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450 442 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 71.8 37% 56.9 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 267 24% 205 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 320GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.24 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 334 Mixed 406 93% 419 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 43 154% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 92.6 90% 142 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 102%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 60GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 20GB free Firmware: 7.24 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 300 Mixed 420 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 47.3 163% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 102 94% 146 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 8 slots used 24GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 240GBHPBench 59%, 62 samples	1x

RAM
14GBUnknownBench 35%, 9,406 samples	1x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16