Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9400 547 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 52.1 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 35.4 26% 35.3 Pts	4-Core 41.1 8-Core 42.3 6% 41.7 Pts	64-Core 42.5 3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 09TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 138 150 116 159 168 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 186 Write 148 Mixed 151 SusWrite 142 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 11 41% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78.5 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 22 32% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 69%
Toshiba MK1233GSG 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 111GB free Firmware: QS001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 47 46 47 47 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 47.8 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 46.7 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo U9300IntelBench 31%, 130 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16