Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9400 547 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 42.7 29% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 38.9 8-Core 42.6 5% 40.8 Pts	64-Core 44 3% 44 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 09TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 170 158 175 162 159 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 200 Write 161 Mixed 170 SusWrite 162 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 12.4 53% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 99.1 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 23.5 36% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba MK1233GSG 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 111GB free Firmware: QS001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 47 47 47 47 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 45.8 Write 44.2 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 47 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo U9300IntelBench 31%, 130 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16