Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 17:05
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 182 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 595 55% 458 Pts	64-Core 1,071 66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3282) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 78 Parallax 74.3 65% 77.3 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 70.6 58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$109 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 554GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 370 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 314 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 26 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 46 231929085988 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4990784076 (F7) Unknown 100 100 156311287 (F8) Unknown 100 100 38790961 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3585 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	67.6% Good	Read 477 Write 337 Mixed 336 85% 384 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 12.3 84% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 12.3 30% 59 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB 4,090 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 305GB free Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 87 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21492597006 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6730 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3793 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2964 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6730 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6730 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 176094707743 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	43.7% Average	Read 78.5 Write 73.8 Mixed 83.1 59% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.15 62% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 84%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 155GB free Firmware: JP4OA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25790120246 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7275 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4633 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3709 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7275 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979609631 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.8% Very good	Read 119 Write 128 Mixed 126 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.41 92% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.3% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 29.9 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 28.6 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)