Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211001
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '22 at 19:56
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	79%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 111 46% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 275 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% PowerColor(148C 2402) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.8% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 81.6 Parallax 149 82% 111 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 104 Splatting 64 63% 78.1 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 2.8 28 2.1 2.3 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 299 Write 235 Mixed 242 SusWrite 39.1 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 9.1 38% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 17.8 DQ Mixed 41 37% 58 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB 4,090 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 316GB free Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 123 133 120 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 22.8 Write 120 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 126 52% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.1 53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 21.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 12.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16