Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 03:47
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 393
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
525GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 418 407 407 410 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 434
Mixed 420
SusWrite 412
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 38.8
126% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 138
155% 264 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 92 93 88 87 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 131
Write 108
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 88.1
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 40.5
Write 40.4
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 41.8
54% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 96%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
263GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.7% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 38.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 41.5
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 17%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
130GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 35 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 37.9
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
136GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 210 224 218 221 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 216
Write 189
Mixed 70
SusWrite 220
228% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10242281 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback