Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130719
Uptime	23 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 191 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 271 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 094E) 512MB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 353.62 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 519GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 421 423 415 420 412 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 440 Mixed 416 SusWrite 415 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 55.4 173% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 297GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 317 323 308 315 306 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 335 Write 349 Mixed 262 SusWrite 313 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 28.2 91% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 136 104% 141 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 36 53 26 33 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 123 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 39.4 58% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 244GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 169 Write 178 Mixed 109 SusWrite 71 172% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 96%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4.6 7% 6.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 7%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 37.3 Write 34.1 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 36.3 47% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 59%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 195GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 217 Write 163 Mixed 92.9 SusWrite 72.4 168% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 95%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 204GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 69 68 70 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	Read 225 Write 122 Mixed 62 SusWrite 69.8 139% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 71% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 296GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 71 70 72 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.8% Average	Read 209 Write 188 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 70.3 168% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10242281 2x8GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 19.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $58

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	508x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	504x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	477x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	474x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	229x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	225x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	155x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	115x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	114x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	70x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	59x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16