Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 21:14
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 136
69% 111 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 319
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 30.8
19% 28.8 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 21.5
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 88 57 7.4 55 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 460
Write 386
Mixed 396
SusWrite 100
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 0.3
28% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
73GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 125 123 137 152 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 99
Write 98
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 136
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
110GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 170 171 165 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 129
Write 58.2
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 168
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85%
Great: 113%
APPLE HDD TOSHIB 750GB
577GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 41.3
51% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback