ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony SVE1713R1EB

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Sony SVE1713R1EB (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 187 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 456 44% 365 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Sony(104D 90AC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 368.81 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.3% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 141 Parallax 131 99% 131 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 132 Splatting 92.3 88% 109 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 438 446 447 446 447 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 434 Mixed 392 SusWrite 439 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 37.5 120% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 364 274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 161GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 234 237 239 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 239 Write 231 Mixed 149 SusWrite 235 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 19.6 78% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 53.9 80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 85%
APPLE HDD TOSHIB 750GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 79GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 18 25 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 24.5 32% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 16GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback