TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 0944____

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 0944____  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30E4
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82
Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 64.1
38% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 63
8-Core 56.8
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 64.4
4% 64.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 39.8%
 Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 30E4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.79 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.55%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC44C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 52 47 58 55 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 62.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 51.6
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 32.5%
 Great: 36%
Multi Flash Reader 64GB
14GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 15
Write 13.8
Mixed 11
SusWrite 11.5
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
172% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 12.2%
 Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 21.2%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback