Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron SI-42 500 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Unknown, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 26.3 24% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 29.3 8-Core 27.8 4% 28.5 Pts	64-Core 28.8 2% 28.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3077) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 480GB 632 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1024A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 57 76 50 131 84 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 214 Write 173 Mixed 187 SusWrite 87.8 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 12.8 48% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 77.9 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 34.9 35% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Turion II Mobile M500AMDBench 34%, 606 samples	2x
TurionX2 Dual Core Mobile RM-76AMDBench 32%, 46 samples	2x
Athlon II M320AMDBench 33%, 922 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	3x
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	3x
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	1x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16