Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 766 78% 632 Pts	64-Core 779 48% 779 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 122 Parallax 106 97% 116 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 107 Splatting 106 86% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21852862 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 104290395881922 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 28 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 38 64426999838 (C2) HDA temperature 30 38 64426999838 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21852862 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21852862 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21852862 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 951 (EA) Unknown 0 0 793 (F1) Unknown 0 0 793 (F2) Unknown 0 0 635 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1900549	45.5% Average	Read 394 Write 101 Mixed 157 47% 217 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 13.4 66% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 62.2 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 30.1 40% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 399GB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34387984806 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1792 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 459 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1792 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1792 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 197569478694 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 118 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.21 92% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 250GB free Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 197 190140 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3925 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2077 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16188 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1943 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1343 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 733 (C2) HDA temperature 108 85 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 13 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.5% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 86.4 Mixed 95.4 70% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.33 89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 52GB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 89 27290264 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5230 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 98274214 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13495 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1038 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 217 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 66 44 82176049186 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 608 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 40013 (C2) HDA temperature 34 56 60129542178 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 56 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 56 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 60 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 67340792239218 (F1) Unknown 100 253 66950664897 (F2) Unknown 100 253 93131386449	65.4% Good	Read 111 Write 117 Mixed 103 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.24 75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 50GB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34388050352 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5004 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10021 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 915 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5005 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5005 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 214749413413 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 28096	69.2% Good	Read 124 Write 117 Mixed 115 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.23 87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB 751 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 54.8 73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,926x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	771x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	367x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	912x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	787x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	784x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	269x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	269x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	198x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	358x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	290x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,003

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16