Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 138% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 90.1 1-Core 154 2-Core 306 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 589 8-Core 1,160 103% 875 Pts	64-Core 2,162 134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4006 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Lighting 189 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 188 154% 126 fps	MRender 213 Gravity 160 Splatting 116 128% 163 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB 2,964 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 576GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1717 1721 1723 1716 1673 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	402% Outstanding	Read 4,603 Write 2,696 Mixed 2,006 SusWrite 1657 607% 2,741 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 69.4 224% 74.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,111 DQ Write 1,003 DQ Mixed 958 746% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 402% Great: 411%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 72GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 151 150 151 151 151 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 448 Mixed 401 SusWrite 184 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 54.8 186% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 115%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 236GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 90 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 94.3 Write 78 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 88.4 62% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 72%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 326 330 330 329 329 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WDC WD80 0JD-22MSA1 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 46GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.9% Poor	Read 57.5 Write 57.7 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 54.9 70% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 27%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 152GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 47 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 50 Write 49.8 Mixed 32 SusWrite 46.3 60% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 887GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 57 60 59 59 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 85 Write 84.2 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 58.9 92% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 44%
Initio INI-T640 160GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 25GB free, PID ce02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 35.5 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 37.4 45% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x8GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 50.3 MC Write 44.3 MC Mixed 45.5 133% 46.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 40.8 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,163x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	312x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16