Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 133% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '20 at 23:05
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 69.1 1-Core 155 2-Core 307 93% 177 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 1,113 103% 860 Pts	64-Core 2,106 130% 2,106 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.77 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 166 Parallax 162 142% 168 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 150 Splatting 113 118% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB 2,964 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 582GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1506 1557 1533 1560 1587 1577 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	353% Outstanding	Read 3,788 Write 2,779 Mixed 1,817 SusWrite 1,553 553% 2,484 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 62.3 205% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,089 DQ Write 825 DQ Mixed 1,059 764% 991 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 353% Great: 411%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 72GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 119 94 90 93 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 443 Mixed 391 SusWrite 139 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 54.3 184% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 115%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 236GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 88 89 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 77.2 Mixed 56 SusWrite 88.2 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 72%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 323 328 330 325 328 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WDC WD80 0JD-22MSA1 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 46GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.5% Poor	Read 57 Write 57.7 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 54.9 70% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 27%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 152GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 47 47 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 50 Write 47.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 46.2 58% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 887GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 60 56 59 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 84 Write 84.8 Mixed 49 SusWrite 58.8 91% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 44%
Initio INI-T640 160GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 25GB free, PID ce02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 33 Write 33.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 37.1 44% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x8GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.1% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 24.4 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,164x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	609x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	480x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,810

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16