Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P5K-E (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20080908
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '15 at 13:55
Run Duration	1152 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 34.1 2-Core 62.3 22% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 62.7 8-Core 62.3 8% 62.5 Pts	64-Core 60.5 4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 2382) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 18.8 17% 21.4 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 22.3 Splatting 22.8 17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 103GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 36 (03) Spinup time 177 174 2150 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10804 (05) Reallocated sector count 171 171 247 (07) Seek error rate 200 155 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3245 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1587 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 2653 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 167 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 148 148 158714 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 195 195 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	28.1% Poor	Read 52.3 Write 45.5 Mixed 23.7 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.16 57% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 48%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1921 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 22228991 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 36006 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1927 (BB) vendor-specific 80 80 20 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 57 47 889913387 (C2) HDA temperature 43 53 47244640299 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 55 15160891 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.7% Below average	Read 59.9 Write 57.2 Mixed 22.9 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.32 78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 53%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 93 88025659 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4538 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 228306783 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2896 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 44 284158328873 (C2) HDA temperature 41 56 64424509481 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 71 60 228099896 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	26.9% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 49 Mixed 45.2 35% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.23 51% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 42%
Maxtor 6 Y080L0 82GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 0GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Read 0.93 Write 0.93 Mixed 0.92 1% 0.93 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.14 20% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	55x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	15x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
256GB SSD 256GB3Bench 62%, 1,638 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	105x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)