TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 142
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 392
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 70.8%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.07%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 200 209 206 217 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 252
Write 243
Mixed 239
SusWrite 208
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 196
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 62.4%
 Great: 133%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
760GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 118 127 125 129 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 116
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 125
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 123%
Maxtor 6 Y080L0 82GB
76GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 27.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 27
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 17.6%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel  $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples80x
Core i7 930Intel  $149Bench 64%, 19,497 samples58x
Core i7 960Intel  $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples45x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples18x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples16x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples12x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $78Bench 106%, 202,785 samples9x
RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples43x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback