Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110303
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '16 at 04:32
Run Duration	1228 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 74.6 1-Core 52.9 2-Core 86.8 47% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 186 21% 167 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 30339886 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 -85392539770519 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1480 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 96 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 30339886 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 30339886 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 30339886 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9512 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8557 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8557 (F2) Unknown 0 0 22192	28.7% Poor	Read 161 Write 80.3 Mixed 98.8 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 8.85 42% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 92.8 DQ Mixed 27.9 44% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2.5TB free, PID null Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 89.2 Write 50.1 Mixed 62.5 80% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.19 87% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 61%
ASMT 2105 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	Read 111 Write 54.5 Mixed 72 92% 79 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.26 128% 4.56 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 59%
ASMT 2105 6TB 2.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.9% Below average	Read 111 Write 54.6 Mixed 73.2 93% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.45 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.27 102% 2.32 MB/s

WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 974GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 98 Write 49.8 Mixed 57.1 79% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.26 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 58%
ASMT 2105 4TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 464GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 99.5 Write 49.5 Mixed 57.3 79% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 349GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 105 Write 54.7 Mixed 45.2 77% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.02 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.25 97% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 49%
ST925032 0AS 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 135GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.7% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 34.1 Mixed 33.8 44% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.24 46% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 25%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 29GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 70.8 Write 13.8 Mixed 23 35% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.19 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.67 46% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 12GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.77% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 9.22 Mixed 14.9 19% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.44 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 25% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	30x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	26x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	55x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 29 samples	3x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16