Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 564
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.5
3% 5.75 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 7.78
6% 6.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
71GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 512
Write 334
Mixed 387
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 19.8
126% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 42.8
41% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 97%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 487
Write 133
Mixed 120
53% 247 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 9.36
104% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 9.43
27% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 135
Mixed 158
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 114%
NORELSYS 106X 3TB
240GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 130
Write 141
Mixed 68
140% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.24
65% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 73%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 32GB
23GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.1% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 31.5
Mixed 17.6
35% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.28
4K Write 3.37
4K Mixed 2.7
241% 5.12 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 32%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
19GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 89.4
Write 78.8
Mixed 76.7
103% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.34
4K Write 3.08
4K Mixed 2.57
227% 5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 32GB
17GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 37.7
Mixed 19.8
40% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.23
4K Write 3.44
4K Mixed 2.73
244% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback