Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX2540 M1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3289-A1
Memory12.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151209
Uptime49 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 136
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 404
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Synology iSCSI Storage 5.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 82 81 81 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 98.8
Write 85
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 80.1
20% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 12.8
39% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 103
75% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 61%
FTS PRAID CP400i 299GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 50 47 48 42 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Read 133
Write 48.5
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 46
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 70%
FTS PRAID CP400i 2TB
888GB free
Firmware: 4.27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 19 21 22 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
118% Outstanding
Read 389
Write 20.5
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 21.8
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
297% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 220%
Samsung STORY Station 2TB
485GB free, PID 5f07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 32
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 40.8
45% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 3x16GB
3 of 24 slots used
48GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 30.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 16.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback