ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2520 M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2520 M1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3169-A1
Memory	38.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150203
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '18 at 10:38
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2407 v2 109 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 89.2 40% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 254 35% 258 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WDS512G1X0C- 512GB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 277GB free Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 373 373 374 374 373 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 400 Write 404 Mixed 227 SusWrite 380 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 38.5 122% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 387 DQ Mixed 460 323% 406 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 153%
FTS PRAID CP400i 299GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 60 60 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.8% Good	Read 184 Write 58.8 Mixed 68 SusWrite 59.4 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 70%
FTS PRAID CP400i 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 481GB free Firmware: 4.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.4% Average	Read 134 Write 12.8 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 13.2 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 28.9 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 14.3 19% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 26.3 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 14.3 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 66%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.9 3.6 3.8 4 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 0.8 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 3.6 6% 5.78 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 6x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.6% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback