HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83A5
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170928
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 215
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 601
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
HP(103C 83A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 141
Parallax 114
98% 125 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 121
Splatting 103
90% 111 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 624 628 629 627 628 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 1,394
Mixed 735
SusWrite 659
250% 1121 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 69.2
240% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1016
DQ Mixed 1,030
794% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 231%
Great: 259%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 114 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 115
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP28D4S7D8HA-16X 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback