Acer Aspire Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire Series  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M680G
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 10:35
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 156
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 201
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Acer(1025 0290) 732MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.91
1% 0.99 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 62 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 71
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 63.3
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 1.6 4.8 5.9 5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 8
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.6
10% 9.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.9
103% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 75.A73C1.G02 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Series Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback