Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 4.9 1-Core 55 2-Core 107 26% 55.7 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 134 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 1.72 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0105ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 365 378 394 412 392 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 458 Write 369 Mixed 318 SusWrite 382 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 22.5 86% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 294 215% 285 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 454 9% 454 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16