MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170829
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '18 at 23:44
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 894
84% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 109
Parallax 92.9
83% 101 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 96.7
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 397 350 247 250 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 467
Mixed 380
SusWrite 308
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 39.5
147% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 325
245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
705GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 176 175 177 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 147
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 176
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
417GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 85.5
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 141
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 114%
WD WD4002FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB
713GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 120 122 119 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 120
Write 125
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 120
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
214% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 114%
Lacie Rugged FW USB3 1TB
201GB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 93 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 64.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 91.6
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim WH 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 123 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 79
Write 130
Mixed 97
SusWrite 121
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $689
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback