Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 88 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 1,020 91% 767 Pts	64-Core 1,409 87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 202 Parallax 195 147% 193 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 182 Splatting 132 120% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 642 327 327 328 329 324 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 2,511 Write 1471 Mixed 1,049 SusWrite 380 298% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 58.9 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 79.1 268% 94.9 MB/s	DQ Read 942 DQ Write 761 DQ Mixed 884 653% 862 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 168GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 489 484 490 491 492 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 485 Mixed 410 SusWrite 488 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 62.6 209% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 374 275% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 165GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 488 483 489 491 463 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 492 Mixed 404 SusWrite 483 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 62.8 210% 73.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 371 272% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 134%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 134GB free Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 215 215 209 202 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 924 Write 677 Mixed 551 SusWrite 223 132% 594 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 53.3 183% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 512 DQ Mixed 392 344% 514 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 144%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 711GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 175 173 171 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 171 Mixed 104 SusWrite 172 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 198 198 197 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 158 Mixed 86 SusWrite 196 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C19 2x8GB 3,646 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 47.7 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 33.8 117% 41.1 GB/s	SC Read 29.1 SC Write 45.7 SC Mixed 32.8 102% 35.9 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $965

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)