Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '18 at 02:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 310
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 40.2
23% 32.9 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 33.7
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 419 412 419 418 398 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 389
Write 433
Mixed 321
SusWrite 406
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 26.4
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 179
168% 257 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
826GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 204 202 204 205 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 155
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 204
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
47GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 16.4
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.5
137% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-031.A00LF 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback