Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '18 at 08:24
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 85.2 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 100 51% 78.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 283 29% 236 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Asus(1043 849E) 3GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 12.4 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 84.7 10% 53.9 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 73.8 Splatting 47.6 52% 66.3 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 60GB 4,789 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 66 62 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 121 Write 69.3 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 61.6 19% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 21.6 93% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 68.9 DQ Mixed 30.7 29% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.3 8.7 8.8 8.8 8.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 8.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 7.5 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.7% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 13 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.6 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89TD PRO USB3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	8x

GPU
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	4x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	2x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16