Asus P5N-D

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-D (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090518
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '18 at 02:13
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	TTO-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 77.7 43% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 161 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1260) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 8.62 Parallax 4.56 8% 7.73 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 6.26 6% 7.44 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1SA754D117 240GB 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: N081 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 98 101 104 104 104 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 130 Write 105 Mixed 112 SusWrite 99.4 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 26.4 87% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 35.4 29% 41.1 MB/s

WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 143GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 59 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 60.9 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 57.9 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 35%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 464GB free Firmware: GM4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 89 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 90.5 Write 77 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 88.8 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 50%
WD 314AS External 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 121GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 32 32 32 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.4% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 32.3 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 31.4 41% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 3.6 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	20x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	7x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	7x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	55x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16