Lenovo F0B100QXXS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0B100QXXS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO CRESCENTBAY
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 25 '18 at 21:09
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 33
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 44.8
26% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 51.7
8-Core 39.5
6% 45.6 Pts
64-Core 27.9
2% 27.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 361D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 5.72
4% 5.48 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4
Splatting 9.78
6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$26
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 127 117 121 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 135
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 124
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
362GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.2
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 18.2
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 44%
ST1750LM 000 HN-M171R 2TB
43GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 34.2
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 18.7
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 10.3
20% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback